You cannot control another person's availability, honesty or consistency. You can get clearer on your own expectations: what makes trust easier, what makes distance feel dangerous, when you ask directly and when protection takes over instead.
This test focuses on your own recurring expectations and responses around support, closeness, distance, trust, conflict and repair — without pretending they explain the other person.
Do you expect support to be available, fear that asking will make you too much, wait for proof that the other person cares or decide it is safer to need nothing? Those assumptions influence what you communicate.
A changed tone, cancelled plan or request for space is an event. The story you attach to it may be rejection, loss of control, danger, relief or nothing serious. That interpretation often drives the next move.
The useful next move is not labelling yourself or the other person. It is recognising what you need enough to ask directly, tolerate an answer and respond with more choice than the automatic pattern gives you.
Use bonds where trust, dependence, closeness, conflict and emotional availability had enough weight to reveal your usual response.
TestCore compares your answers across five profiles. The result describes your reported pattern; it does not classify your partner or score the relationship itself.
Use the report to separate your recurring expectation from the other person's actual behaviour and decide what needs clearer communication, firmer boundaries or more evidence.
No. It describes your own attachment-related tendencies. Relationship health also depends on safety, respect, consistency, compatibility, communication and the other person's behaviour.
No. The result is based on your self-report. It cannot reliably classify someone else from your interpretation of their actions.
That difference matters. Trust, consistency, stress and relationship history can change how attachment concerns appear. Use the leading profile as a broad pattern while keeping important exceptions visible.
No. It is not a compatibility or relationship-decision tool. Use it to understand your own pattern, then evaluate the actual relationship on its behaviour and circumstances.
Yes. Safer and more consistent relationships, clearer communication, self-awareness and therapy can all support more secure ways of relating over time.
No. It is an educational self-report assessment, not a mental health diagnosis or clinical evaluation of you or another person.
You can examine the expectations and protective habits you bring into a relationship without assuming every problem comes from you. The point is to separate what belongs to your pattern from what the other person's actual behaviour is showing you.